I'm a cognitive psychologist working in the Department of Otolaryngology at Washington University in Saint Louis. I study the neuroscience of speech comprehension, aging, and hearing impairment. For more on my research, please see my lab webpage.
I also have a courtesy appointment in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, and am affiliated with the PNP program, Lingusitics program, and Department of Biology and Biomedical Sciences (DBBS).
Many conferences and workshops provide forms to ask participants for feedback. It is important to participate in this process, and a great opportunity to provide input relating to issues such as speaker balance, childcare, and student/postdoc involvement.
What's the best Bayesian analysis for a group x condition accuracy interaction?
Reviewing manuscripts is an important part of the scientific ecosystem and something we should all do. However, reviewing may not actually help our career all that much, and it's hard to know how much reviewing we should do relative to other activities. Here I suggest that early career scientists in particular should be careful not to review too much.
Regularly reviewing the things we are glad we are doing, the things we wish we weren't doing, and how to change these lists can be a tremendous benefit in keeping our lives on track. Here's a form to help make that happen.
For archives or to subscribe via RSS, see http://jonathanpeelle.net/linked/